r/TwoHotTakes 6d ago

Update: My supervisor met my boyfriend and now she wants an HR meeting Listener Write In

[removed]

18.8k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

147

u/Ok_Statistician_9825 6d ago

Church schools, private schools can terminate employment for any reason they choose. I’ll bet my paycheck someone leaks this to a parent who will complain so start looking for a job. Keep pushing the fact that someone engaged in using the OF site and was familiar enough with it to recognize your BF. That’s the only recourse you have. I’m sorry.,

15

u/cornnndoggg_ 6d ago edited 6d ago

someone engaged in using the OF site and was familiar enough with it to recognize your BF.

This is the most important part. I am aware of how the site works, and by design, you cannot access, really any, content without intentionally interacting with each individual creators page. The most you would get without doing so is just a circle-cropped profile picture, which, if you gave me one cropped image of someone, there's no way in hell I'd recognize them in public. If someone could they must look at that pic pretty often.

So it's pretty much a given that this person is interacting with the BFs account, and enough that they would recognize the person in public. Wild that someone related in some way to the creator is more guilty of whatever they deem is the problem here than the person actively consuming the content.

edit: was thinking about this more wanted to clarify a detail: the "must interact before seeing content" rule also applies to free pages that don't have a monthly subscription cost, which means even if you didn't pay, you still have to actively interact. Also, it is extremely uncommon for creators to have anything in their banner or profile picture that is explicit content, which means that if this person knows there's explicit content, it means they 100% interacted with it.

2

u/Skullclownlol 6d ago

The most you would get without doing so is just a circle-cropped profile picture, which, if you gave me one cropped image of someone, there's no way in hell I'd recognize them in public.

For research purposes I took a look - you can click the profile image to get the full-size image. It's in high def and you 100% can recognize people.

Though I agree that someone probably paid for access, but legally speaking that doesn't change a thing.