11
u/ApocalypseYay 1d ago
The Universe Is So Beautiful
True.
The numinous beauty is humbling and profound.
3
7
u/Resident-Leather7837 1d ago
Hate to crush your dream like mine once was, but those colours aren't actually what's visible to us... Some of the colours show UV-rays and gamma-rays which aren't visible to the human eye.
3
u/FRleo_85 1d ago
yes but, your honor... cool galaxy picture!
1
u/Resident-Leather7837 1d ago
I must tell people of this great lie
2
u/Common-Concentrate-2 1d ago
What's really important is..did this galaxy have a limited slip differential, and positraction?
8
u/Semarin 1d ago
What is the galaxy name in the second picture?
3
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
NGC 1097
9
u/harry-asklap 1d ago
No it isn't. I think the second one isnt real
4
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/08/30/monster-galaxy-forms-stars-faster-than-milky-way/1142302002/ My mistake it’s called Aztec cosmo 1
5
u/harry-asklap 1d ago
It literally says illustration in the video.
-2
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
Dude it clearly says rendered in the site. No one has claimed it’s not
8
u/harry-asklap 1d ago
Then why put it together with real galaxies?
-3
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
it’s a render of a real galaxy
10
8
u/zoroddesign 1d ago edited 1d ago
A google search does not bring up the same galaxy. it brings up a barred spiral galaxy.
it is actually a monster galaxy named COSMOS-AzTEC-1' This is also just an artistic interpretation of what this galaxy looks like.
4
3
u/jppope 1d ago
I seemed to remember they augment the photos with extra color, am I making that up or is it true?
1
u/speedyblackman 1d ago
its true, different colours are used to highlight different sections in the light spectrum
3
u/CreditorOP 1d ago
Absolutely, it’s incredible how vast and breathtaking the universe is. It’s like the more you learn about it, the more awe-inspiring it becomes.
2
2
2
2
2
u/shuriken_dz77 1d ago
Imagine all this universe and how large it is, so many planets... 8 billion people on earth only, and you still single
1
2
u/Pilot0350 1d ago
Is the second photo real or rendered? Anyone got a NASA link?
2
0
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
NGC 1097
3
u/Pilot0350 1d ago
So it's a render and not the galaxy you suggested
3
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
Actually it called cosmo aztec 1 - https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/08/30/monster-galaxy-forms-stars-faster-than-milky-way/1142302002/
4
u/Pilot0350 1d ago
So an artists render but still a real galaxy. How neat is that! I wonder what crazy physics had to take place to get two smaller gravitational centers to orbit one large one like that. Wild.
2
2
2
1
1
1
u/Rare-Somewhere22 1d ago
The photos they get out in space is awesome. And to think there's so much unknown out there too.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Fickle-Molasses-903 1d ago
I always imagine there is a planet that mirrors earth. It's not impossible considering the vast planets out there. It's mind-boggling.
1
u/Mercurius_Hatter 1d ago
Every time I see those images, I'm awestruck, and how insignificant we humanity really are.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Awkward-Gazelle-5071 1d ago
From what I hear a mist of these photos are digitally colored and are actually black and white. This is done to increase the public’s enthusiasm for space exploration
1
1
1
u/Salty_Elephant_1214 1d ago
is this what you would see if you were floating around out in space at the right distance, or is the image somehow enhanced?
1
u/Virtual_Information3 1d ago
most of them are rendered/enhanced because these pics are taken of galaxies far far away
1
1
1
u/Rustic-Cuss 1d ago
Only no. 2 is “fake”; it’s Astro art, not an actual photograph. The rest are real.
1
1
u/Free_Cartoonist_8333 1d ago
I can see the beauty of myself in these pictures. The universe is truly a work of art. I would love to meet the artist
1
1
1
1
0
u/Slammer3000 1d ago
Why is it like that
3
u/RainaElf 1d ago
what?
1
u/Slammer3000 1d ago
The angle it sits at
1
u/RainaElf 1d ago
which one?
1
u/Slammer3000 1d ago
The first three
1
2
0
u/Horus_simplex 1d ago
It's in your head - the measure and judgment of beauty, not inherent to the objects you're seeing. So it's more correct to say that based on your human appreciation, you find it beautiful (at the reasonable distance we are from those objects).
0
u/throwawaybyefelicia 1d ago
Never seen anything like image 2 before, what is that called? It looks amazing.
-1
-1
34
u/takesalicking 1d ago
I was expecting 7 of 9 to look a bit different.
I'll see myself out, TY.